volBrain Analysis

AssemblyNet Volumetry

Loading scan data...

ICV (cm³)
Brain Volume
Structures
Loading AssemblyNet data

What This Means

🧠

Interpretation

Not medical advice. Structural data only.

Key Finding

Jon’s cerebrum is globally balanced at the macro level (+0.40% R>L), while his cerebellum shows meaningful right-lateralization (+6.33%). The pattern suggests a brain that is locally specialized rather than globally asymmetric.

Macro Symmetry

Structure Asymmetry Assessment
Cerebrum +0.40% R>L Balanced
Cerebellum +6.33% R>L Right-lateralized
Cerebellar GM +8.37% R>L Strongly right-lateralized

Notable Regional Asymmetries

Region Asymmetry Functional Association
Sup. Frontal Gyrus (medial) +26.84% R>L Self-monitoring, meta-control
Occipital Fusiform +23.23% R>L Visual pattern recognition
Calcarine Cortex +22.54% R>L Primary visual processing
Frontal Pole +20.58% R>L Abstract reasoning, planning
Planum Temporale −46.13% L>R Auditory-language specialization
Opercular Inf. Frontal −44.68% L>R Speech production (Broca’s area)
Ant. Cingulate −29.56% L>R Conflict monitoring, effort allocation

Interpretation

Jon’s profile shows globally typical anatomy with locally specialized networks. The rightward visual/occipital bias suggests strong spatial-visual modeling capability. The leftward cingulate pattern indicates a conflict-monitoring system that may be sensitive to context and benefit from externalized structure. The cerebellar right-lateralization (matching his CERES findings) supports prediction and automation loops.

Practical Implication: Jon’s brain appears optimized for visual-first thinking, high-level steering, and pattern synthesis. Executive function may be state-dependent—excellent at big-picture modeling but variable under low novelty or ambiguity. External scaffolding (visible task state, diagrams, structured workflows) isn’t compensating for weakness; it’s leveraging architectural strengths.

Caveat: This is structural volumetry from a single scan, not functional imaging. Large regional asymmetries (especially in opercular/orbital regions) can reflect normal anatomical variation and segmentation boundaries. Use as hypothesis-generating, not diagnostic.